|
|
POLICY |
|
|
GUIDELINES &
PRACTICES |
|
|
Timeline for appeal
1. A Homeswest customer has the right to appeal an unfavourable decision related to public rental housing, bond assistance and home loans, within twelve months of the decision being made.
|
1.1 A decision made more than a year ago will be reviewed and may proceed through the appeals process, at the discretion of the Regional Manager.
|
|
Ineligible decisions
2. A decision may not be appealed:
|
2.1 A review will not be made of a decision to evict after the Notice of Termination is issued, or in the case of legal recovery of a loan, after the Default, Annulment or Determination Notice is issued;
2.2 A decision of general application can be appealed, as it applies to an individual customer e.g.. A customer may appeal the assessment of his/her rental increase..
|
|
|
POLICY |
|
|
GUIDELINES &
PRACTICES |
|
|
Review factors
3. An unfavourable decision will be reassessed on the
following
basis:
(I) What are the facts of the case?
(ii) What policy was applied?
(iii) Was the policy relevant?
(iv) Was policy correctly applied to the
facts?
(v) Was the customer situation given comprehensive
consideration?
(vi) Was Homeswest discretion fairly exercised, having
regard to the facts of the case and policy?
|
3.1 These factors will be considered by reviewers at
each tier of the appeal process;
|
|
Unwritten decisions
4. A customer receiving an unfavourable decision in
response to an informal enquiry will be advised of his/her appeal
rights.
|
4.1 A counter or telephone customer will be given a full
and clear explanation of the reasons in relation to policy for any unfavourable
decision and be advised that he/she may receive a written decision and review by
an independent officer;
4.2 A customer wishing a review may request an
opportunity to present his/her case to the reviewer, otherwise the review will
conducted without representation by or on behalf of the
customer;
4.3 A customer seeking a written review will be advised
of the outcome within seven days of the request.
4.4 Reinstatement of applications – see 7
to 7.2 WAITING LIST
MANAGEMENT POLICY.
|
|
|
POLICY |
|
|
GUIDELINES &
PRACTICES |
|
|
Tier 1
5. Before a written unfavourable decision is provided to
a customer, the decision must be reviewed.
|
5.1 Where there has been an unfavourable decision made
by an officer the Regional/Branch Manager will appoint an officer to review and
assess the original decision. The reviewing officer will be an officer of equal
or higher level then the original decision-maker.
Wherever possible, the reviewer will be an officer at a
higher level than the original decision-maker. Tenant liability charges
incurred by customers whilst in occupation of a property will also be reviewed
in the same manner.
5.2. Following the automatic written TIER 1 DECISION
REVIEW, the customer will be provided with a copy of the Decision Review
Form detailing the reasons for the unfavourable decision, the names and contact
telephone numbers of the officers involved in the review, a copy of the relevant
policy and information about the appeal process i.e.. an appeal information
brochure, an appeal application form and a list of local advocacy
agencies.
5.3 Reinstatement of applications – see WAITING LIST MANAGEMENT
POLICY 7 to 7.2.
|
|
Tier 2
6. A customer dissatisfied with the outcome of the
TIER 1 DECISION REVIEW has the right to apply for a hearing by an appeals
committee, by making a written appeal against the unfavourable
decision.
|
6.1 Should a customer lodge a written appeal before an
unfavourable decision has been formally reviewed, the Tier 1 Decision Review
Form will be completed. If the unfavourable decision is confirmed, the appeal
process will continue with arrangements for a hearing. In the event, the review
overturns the unfavourable decision, the customer will be advised of the
favourable decision and the appeal considered withdrawn
(resolved);
6.2 Executive decisions
An unfavourable decision made by Homeswest Executive
may be appealable. However, where a Tier 2 committee is considering upholding
such an appeal and the manner is of a sensitive or contentious nature, the
appeal should be adjourned and the Chairperson of the committee should bring the
concerns to the Regional manager to present to the Executive Director, prior to
making their decisions.
|
|
|
POLICY |
|
|
GUIDELINES &
PRACTICES |
|
|
|
Example:
An appeal to be re-housed by an ex-tenant evicted by
Homeswest with a history of antisocial behaviour, which has involved
neighbourhood disruption and media attention.
6.3 Tier 2 Committee
A TIER 2 APPEALS COMMITTEE will be maintained in
each Homeswest region of the State. Usually to facilitate attendance, an appeal
will be heard by the Appeals Committee, located nearest to the home of the
appellant. Exceptions to this general rule are hearings in the metropolitan area
and appeals against decline of priority and priority transfer, which will be
heard by the Appeals Committee in the region where the customer wishes to
live;
6.4 Where a Regional Appeals Committee is not located
within easy travelling distance of the appellant, arrangements will be made for
a hearing by conference telephone. An appellant may request a hearing by
telephone or that the hearing be held at a neutral location;
6.5 Tier 2 hearing arrangements
The appellant will be notified of arrangements for the
hearing in writing and encouraged to attend to explain his/her case, accompanied
by a friend, relative, witness and/or advocate. Where the appellant nominates
an advocate a minimum of 2 weeks notice of the Regional Appeals Committee
hearing date will be given to the appellant and advocate.
6.6 An interpreter will be provided for an appellant
requesting this service;
6.7 If the appellant fails to keep the hearing
appointment without timely and adequate reason, the Committee may make its
decision based on the documentation; a request for a re-hearing is at the
discretion of the Regional Manager;
6.8 The appellant will be advised of the Appeals
Committee decision in writing, within one month of lodging the appeal
application. If the Tier 2 decision is unfavourable, information will be
forwarded with the Appeals Committee Decision Form about proceeding with the
appeal.
|
|
|
POLICY |
|
|
GUIDELINES &
PRACTICES |
|
|
|
Referral to Local Court
Customers with an appeal about debt or occupied
maintenance covered by the Residential Tenancies Act 1987, Section 42, and are
not eligible to proceed to Tier 3. And will be referred to the State Ombudsman
and the Small Disputes Division of the Local Court; information to assist with
taking legal action will be provided e.g. The Department of Consumer &
Employment Protection Tenancy Note: Settling Disputes in Court
pamphlet.
|
|
Composition of Appeals Committee
7. A TIER 2 APPEALS COMMITTEE will comprise a
senior Homeswest officer not involved in the original decision-making and an
independent community representative.
|
7.1 Homeswest representative on the Appeals Committee
will be an officer appointed by the Regional/Branch Manager to hear appeals
against decisions made by officers at the level of the Tier 1 reviewer and,
wherever possible, will be a senior level to the reviewer;
7.2 The independent community member will be one of a
pool of community representatives appointed by the Regional/Branch Manager in
consultation with local community agencies representative of Homeswest customer
base. Members will be selected on the basis of demonstrated qualifications,
experience, knowledge, skills and abilities and/or interest in the fields of
community welfare, public housing and/or cultural and Aboriginal
affairs;
7.3 An Appeals Committee member must ensure he/she is
able to hear an appeal without bias and disqualify him/herself from considering
an appeal, if he/she has knowledge of the appellant or appellant family which
might be considered prejudicial to a fair hearing;
7.4 An Appeals Committee may adjourn its sitting to obtain additional information. 7.5 In the case of a Regional Appeals Committee upholding a customer’s appeal the officers who were involved in the unfavourable tier 1 decision review will be advised in writing of the Regional Appeals Committee decision that upholds the customers appeal. |
|
|
POLICY |
|
|
GUIDELINES &
PRACTICES |
|
|
Authority of Tier 2 Committee
8. The two members of the Appeals Committee will have
equal powers and their favourable decision will be binding upon
Homeswest.
|
8.1 Every effort will be made to ensure that the
Committee comprises a male and female member. When this is not possible, an
appellant of the opposite gender to the members is to be offered the opportunity
of a rescheduled hearing. It is essential that a female member hears an appeal
involving domestic violence;
8.2 Failure to agree a decision
Should the two Committee members fail to agree a
decision, the reasons for the disagreement are to be recorded; and:
(i) Appeals involving charges for tenant liability
items if the item or items under dispute amount to $50 or less, the sum will be
waived;
(ii) Other Appeal
Categories
|
|
|
POLICY |
|
|
GUIDELINES &
PRACTICES |
|
|
9. An appellant or advocate may challenge the right of a
panel member to hear an appeal, if they have a perception regarding the
member’s ability to remain impartial. In such circumstances the Panel
member will be excluded from hearing the appeal
|
9.1 Where the appellant wished to maintain privacy and
the panel member is known to them personally.
9.2 Where the panel member represents an organisation
that has contact with the appellant, regarding the substance of their
appeal.
9.3 Where the appellant believes that the member may be
antagonistic towards them or their situation.
9.4 Where a challenge reduces the number of panel
members below the minimum required, the appeal will be adjourned to the next
sitting and a suitable replacement found.
|
|
People Receiving Payment from
Homeswest
10. Tier 2 members will have no other direct involvement
Homeswest, which results in remuneration of services, to or on behalf of,
Homeswest.
|
10.1 Example:
Member of Homeswest Board of
Commissioners.
Members of agencies, where the agency and not the
individual receive payment are not excluded.
Example:
Shelter WA, SHAP.
|
|
Tier 3
11. A customer dissatisfied with the outcome from the
Tier 2 Appeals Committee may appeal to the TIER 3 PUBLIC HOUSING REVIEW PANEL,
within 60 days of receiving the unfavourable decision.
|
11.1 An appeal to the PUBLIC HOUSING REVIEW PANEL must
be in writing;
11.2 The Panel will only review appeals which have been
considered by a Tier 2 Appeals Committee;
11.3 An appeal decided more than 60 days ago by an
Appeals Committee may be reviewed, at the discretion of the Panel. The appeal
application will be submitted to the next Panel sitting for a decision by the
residing chairperson.
11.4 An appellant may request an opportunity to explain
his/her case but a hearing is at the discretion of the Panel.
|
|
|
POLICY |
|
|
GUIDELINES &
PRACTICES |
|
|
|
11.5 Executive Decision:
Where the Tier 3 panel considers that upholding an
appeal, which has been subject to Executive decision, the panel should adjourn
for the Chairperson to present the case to the Executive Director, prior to
making a decision.
|
|
Ineligible Tier 3 Appeals
12. Decisions regarding:
are
ineligible for a review at Tier 3.
|
12.1 Appellants with an ineligible appeal will be
referred to an alternative avenue of appeal e.g.. the State Ombudsman, the Small
Disputes Division of the Local Court.
|
|
Composition of Tier 3 Panel
13. The Tier 3 Public Housing Review Panel will comprise
three independent community representatives with equal decision making
powers.
|
13.1 A pool of community representatives will be
appointed by the State Minister for Housing and their selection will be based on
demonstrated qualifications, experience, knowledge, skills and abilities and/or
interest in the fields of community welfare, public housing and/or aboriginal
and cultural affairs.
13.2 The Panel will make its own
procedures;
13.3 At the discretion of the Panel, one member may
review an appeal and make a determination on behalf of the
Panel.
13.4 In the event three sitting members fail to reach a
unanimous determination, the majority decision will prevail. The dissenting
member may record the reasons for his/her decision.
|
Authority of the Panel
14 The determination of the Panel is binding on Homeswest. |
14.1 The Panel will consider the documentation about an
appeal and may adjourn for additional written information or to hear from the
appellant and/or Homeswest.
|
|
|
POLICY |
|
|
GUIDELINES &
PRACTICES |
|
|
14.2 The determination of the Panel will be provided to
the appellant in writing, within one month of the review request. An appellant
receiving an unfavourable determination will be referred to the State Ombudsman,
as a means of pursuing an investigation of the decision.
14.3 The Panel will consider appeals and make
determinations within the framework of existing policy. However, the Panel may
make recommendations about policy to Homeswest Executive Director and/or the
Minister for Housing e.g. the Panel may report on matters where application of
policy causes an unintended result, which disadvantages a
customer.
Tier 2 Appeals Committee community representatives may
make recommendations regarding policy to the Tier 3 Public Housing Review Panel
and/or to Homeswest.
|
|
|
Record Keeping
15. A permanent record of appeals will be kept.
|
15.1 Documentation about individual appeals will be
maintained on the customer’s personal file or work file.
15.2 Monthly statistics will be maintained in each
region by an Appeals Officer appointed by the Regional/Branch Manager, and
forwarded by the fifth working day after the end of the month to the Appeals
Coordinator for collation.
15.3 Appeal applications and outcomes will be monitored on a regional basis and any trends e.g.. Impact of policy change or variation in local conditions recorded on a quarterly basis in the Rental Operations Quarterly Report. 15.4 Where the Panel identifies a policy or polices that have negative consequences for customers it will advise the Department through the State Manager Rental Services. The Panel will also make recommendations for policy changes where it considers existing policy is either deficient or ambiguous. |